Skip to main content

Advertisement

Volume 10 Supplement 1

de Senectute: Age and Health Forum

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in the elderly: endovascular versus open surgical repair

Article metrics

  • 1432 Accesses

Background

The traditional surgical intervention of open aneurysmectomy and prosthetic graft is still now the gold standard for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Today, the new mini-invasive endovascular approach is a valid therapeutic option to customize the treatment based on clinical characteristics of patient and morphological features of the aneurysmal lesion. The purpose of this study is to establish which technique is more suitable for the treatment of the AAA in the elderly patients.

Materials and methods

100 patients aged between 65 and 75 (M:F 85:15) were enrolled in 3 years. After a preoperative cardiac screening, patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients. In group I were included high risk patients (acute renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and valvular defects), while in group II were included low risk patients with not relevant pathologies. All patients of group I underwent endovascular and surgical treatment, patients in group II were submitted to "open" surgical intervention because of moderate risk.

Results

Of the 50 patients of group I, 2 deaths have occurred in the immediate post-operative period for pre-existing comorbidities. The follow-up at 12 months with eco Doppler ultrasonography showed the absence of endoleak or an increase in the volume of AAA in 45 patients, while for the last 3 patients an open laparotomy was performed for a conversion with a prosthetic graft immediately after the endovascular procedure. In the immediate post-operative period, we registered 4 deaths among patients of group II due to cardiac arrhythmic or ischemic complications or lung failure. The follow up at 12 months has shown paresis of the ileum in 3 patients; the other 43 had a normal post-operative course, Table 1.

Table 1 Table 1

Conclusions

The study shows that the minimally invasive and endovascular method represents a valid therapeutic option especially in high risk patients with a reduction in immediate post-operative complications. The one year follow-up has revealed the normal predictable incidence of complications.

References

  1. 1.

    Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, Lin PH, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM, Peduzzi PN: Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. 2009, 302 (14): 1535-42.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to R Russo.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, R. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) in the elderly: endovascular versus open surgical repair. BMC Geriatr 10, A75 (2010) doi:10.1186/1471-2318-10-S1-A75

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • Prosthetic Graft
  • Ischemic Complication