Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between multimorbidity and institutional care willingness among older adults in Shandong, China, 2018 (N = 8583)

From: Do older adults with multimorbidity prefer institutional care than those without multimorbidity? The role of functional limitation

Characteristics

Model 1a

 

Model 2b

 

Model 3c

OR (95% CI)

P-value

 

OR (95% CI)

P-value

 

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Main terms

 Chronic health conditions (No chronic condition Ref)

  One chronic condition

1.02 (0.85, 1.23)

0.803

 

1.08 (0.89, 1.30)

0.440

 

1.09 (0.90, 1.32)

0.396

  Multimorbidity

1.17 (0.95, 1.43)

0.104

 

1.25 (1.06, 1.55)

0.040

 

1.42 (1.13, 1.78)

0.003

 Functional limitations (No Ref)

  Yes

0.82 (0.63, 1.08)

0.168

 

1.11 (0.80, 1.55)

0.526

 

2.02 (1.18, 3.43)

0.010

Interaction term

  (No chronic condition × Without functional limitations Ref)

  One chronic condition × Functional limitations

      

0.67 (0.34, 1.32)

0.245

  Multimorbidity × Functional limitations

      

0.29 (0.14, 0.61)

0.001

Controls

 Gender (Male Ref)

  Female

0.83 (0.71, 0.97)

0.021

 

1.09 (0.91, 1.30)

0.344

 

1.09 (0.91, 1.30)

0.358

 Age

0.94 (0.93, 0.96)

 < .001

 

0.95 (0.93, 0.96)

 < .001

 

0.95 (0.93, 0.96)

 < .001

 Education (Illiteracy Ref)

  Primary school

1.96 (1.54, 2.49)

 < .001

 

1.86 (1.45, 2.40)

 < .001

 

1.89 (1.47, 2.43)

 < .001

  Junior school

2.89 (2.27, 3.67)

 < .001

 

2.41 (1.83, 3.17)

 < .001

 

2.44 (1.85, 3.22)

 < .001

  Middle school or above

3.16 (2.43, 4.13)

 < .001

 

2.58 (1.87, 3.56)

 < .001

 

2.61 (1.89, 3.60)

 < .001

 Marital statusd (Single Ref)

  Married

1.20 (0.95, 1.50)

0.122

 

0.92 (0.67, 1.25)

0.573

 

0.92 (0.68, 1.25)

0.600

 Employment status (Employed Ref)

  Retired

1.31 (1.07, 1.60)

0.008

 

1.37 (1.04, 1.81)

0.023

 

1.37 (1.04, 1.80)

0.025

  Unemployed

0.72 (0.59, 0.87)

0.001

 

0.96 (0.78, 1.18)

0.678

 

0.95 (0.77, 1.18)

0.658

 Region (Urban Ref)

  Rural

1.31 (1.12, 1.54)

0.001

 

1.56 (1.29, 1.89)

 < .001

 

1.57 (1.29, 1.90)

 < .001

 Living arrangements (With others Ref)

  Alone

1.00 (0.78, 1.28)

0.989

 

1.11 (0.79, 1.56)

0.544

 

1.12 (0.80, 1.56)

0.528

 Household incomee (Q1 Ref)

  Q2

0.94 (0.75, 1.17)

0562

 

0.75 (0.59, 0.95)

0.015

 

0.75 (0.59, 0.94)

0.014

  Q3

0.98 (0.78, 1.23)

0.866

 

0.69 (0.54, 0.90)

0.006

 

0.69 (0.54, 0.90)

0.006

  Q4

1.35 (1.08, 1.69)

0.008

 

0.83 (0.62, 1.11)

0.212

 

0.83 (0.61, 1.11)

0.205

 Health records (Yes Ref)

  No

1.28 (1.05, 1.54)

0.012

 

0.83 (0.67, 1.04)

0.108

 

0.83 (0.67, 1.04)

0.109

 Family doctor (Yes Ref)

  No

2.00 (1.71, 2.35)

 < .001

 

1.85 (1.54, 2.24)

 < .001

 

1.85 (1.54, 2.23)

 < .001

 Social activity (Yes Ref)

  No

0.99 (0.83, 1.19)

0.947

 

0.97 (0.79, 1.18)

0.753

 

0.97 (0.79, 1.18)

0.730

 Need caregiving (Yes Ref)

  No

0.81 (0.61, 1.08)

0.147

 

0.99 (0.71, 1.38)

0.932

 

1.03 (0.74, 1.43)

0.882

 BMI (Underweight Ref)

  Normal

1.34 (0.89, 2.02)

0.155

 

1.07 (0.73, 1.36)

0.756

 

1.08 (0.71, 1.63)

0.729

  Overweight

1.56 (1.04, 2.35)

0.032

 

1.09 (0.57, 1.00)

0.698

 

1.10 (0.72, 1.68)

0.655

  Obesity

1.73 (1.11, 2.67)

0.014

 

1.20 (1.82, 3.50)

0.431

 

1.21 (1.77, 1.91)

0.408

  1. a Unadjusted univariate model;
  2. b Adjusted multivariate model;
  3. c Adjusted for model 2 criteria and the interaction between chronic health conditions and functional limitations;
  4. d Singles include those who are unmarried (81, 0.94%), divorced (51, 6.0%) and widowed (1248, 14.54%);
  5. e Quartile 1 (Q1) was the poorest and Quartile 4 (Q4) was the richest