Quality assessment tool for Qualitative studies | |
 (1) Were the aims of the research clearly stated? | |
 (2) Was a clearly defined method of recruitment used and explicit inclusion/ exclusion criteria described? | |
 3) Was the process of data collection explained clearly? Was data collection standardised? | |
 4) Did the researchers attain saturation of data? | |
 (5) Was the process of data analysis sufficiently rigorous, i.e. ≥2 raters, some method of resolving discrepancies? | |
 6) Have the findings been validated by participants? | |
Quality assessment tool for Intervention studies | |
 (1) Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups? (was randomisation independent?) | |
 (2) Were patients and clinicians as far as possible ‘masked’ for treatment allocation? | |
 (3) Were all patients who entered the trial accounted for and an intention to treat analysis used? | |
 (4) Were all participants followed up and data collected in the same way? | |
 (5) Was a power calculation carried out, based on one or more outcomes of interest? |