PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE TRAINING | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study Ascending effect | Intervention | Duration and frequency | Total doses (minutes) | Intensity | Baseline gait speed (mean (SD)) | Gait speed test | Exercise compliance | Mean age | Pedro score |
Fiatarone (1994) [29] | Progressive resistance exercise training of hip and knee extensors | 10Â weeks, 3x p/w; 45Â min. | 1350 | 80Â % of 1 RM | 0.51 (0.20) | Stopwatch: 6.1-m course | 97Â % | 87 | 7 |
Liu-Ambrose (2004) [31] | Progressive high- intensity resistance training initially set at 50–60 % of 1RM (two sets of 10–15 repetitions) progressing to 75-85 % of 1 RM (two sets of 6–8 repetitions) | 13 weeks, 2x p/w 50 min. | 1300 | Progressing from 50-60 % to 75–85 % of 1RM | 1.02 (0.25) | Stopwatch: 5-m | 85,4 % interv. | 79 | 5 |
78.8Â % control | |||||||||
Lustosa (2011) [36] | Supervised lower limbs exercises with open chain ankle weights exercises and closed chain body weight exercises | 10Â weeks, 3x p/w, 60Â min. | 1800 | 50-70Â % of 1 RM | 1.24 (0.14) | Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated) | - | 72 | 7 |
Persch (2009) [35] | Supervised progressive lower limb strength training | 12 weeks, 3x p/w, (estimated at 50 min.) | +/−1800 | 10-12 maximal reps. | 1.23 (0.07) | 6-camera motion analysis system (Vicon) | 93 % | 61 | 6 |
Cress (1999) [34] | Supervised combined endurance and strength training | 6Â months, 3x p/w for 60Â min. | 4860 | 75-80Â % intensity (1 RM and HRR) | 1.46 (0.20) | Stopwatch: 20-m course | 80.5Â % | 76 | 5 |
PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE + BALANCE TRAINING | |||||||||
Freiberger (2012) [32] | 1)(SB)Strength and balance group: Progressive upper and lower body strength, balance -, and motor coordination training | 16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min. | 1920 | Progressive exertion according BORG scale (not specified) | 0.95 (0.22) | Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated) | 83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions | 76 | 8 |
Yang (2011) | Personalized home balance and strength exercise program (Based on Otago Exercise Program) | 6 months, 5x p/w for +/− 20 min. and daily graduated walking program | 2700 | Progressive adjustments at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after the baseline | 1.02 (0.26) | Stopwatch: 6-m (accelerated) | 44.1 % 5x p/w | 71 | 7 |
39Â % 3-4x p/w | |||||||||
13.6Â % <2x p/w | |||||||||
Arai (2007) [37] | Supervised progressive resistance training and balance training according to ACSM guidelines | 3 months, 2x p/w for 90 min. | 2430 | 65-75 % of 1 RM, 10–15 reps. | 1.28 (0.24) | Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated) | - | 74 | 5 |
Gine-Garriga (2010) [38] | Overload functional circuit training focused at functional balance and lower body strength | 12 weeks, 2x p/w; 45 min. | 1080 | Strength training at perceived exertion of 12–14 on the BORG scale increasing from 6–15 reps. Increasing difficulty in balance exercise | 0.82 (0.04) | Stopwatch: 8-m couse (accelerated) | 90 % interv. | 84 | 6 |
76Â % control | |||||||||
PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE + BALANCE + ENDURANCE TRAINING | |||||||||
Baker (2007) [40] | Supervised exercise: high-intensity progressive resistance training 3Â days per week, moderate-intensity aerobic training 2Â days per week, and progressive balance training 1Â day per week | 10Â weeks, 3 to 4Â h per week divided over 3Â days | 5400-7200 | 80Â % of 1RM. Aerobic training: rating of perceived exertion 11 to 14 (20) on the BORG scale | 1.23 (0.28) | Ultrasonic transmitter/ receiver over 2-m | 90Â % (excluding dropouts) | 77 | 7 |
Barnett (2003) [39] | Supervised exercise consisting of balance, coordination, endurance and strength training + home exercise program based on class content | 4 periods over 1 year 1x p/w; 60 min. (37 lessons) | 2220 | Complexity, speed and resistance were steadily increased over de 4 periods | 0.95 (0.30) | Stopwatch: 6-m course | 33.7 % attended ≥ 30 of 37 sessions | 75 | 8 |
Freiberger (2012) [32] | 2)(FG)Fitness Group; Strength-, balance -and endurance training | 16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min. | 1920 | Progressive in duration and exertion according BORG scale (not specified) | 0.98 (0.18) | Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated) | 83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions | 76 | 8 |
Freiberger (2007) [30] | Fitness intervention: group and home-based strength, flexibility-, balance and motor coordination-, and endurance training | 16Â weeks, 2x p/w; 60Â min. | 1920 | Not described | 1.40 (0.30) | Stopwatch: 8-m (accelerated) | 84Â % | 76 | 7 |
Doi (2013) [41] | Supervised multicomponent exercise including aerobic exercise, balance-, strength- and gait training | 6Â months, 2x p/w for 90Â min. | 4860 | Aerobic exercise and gait-training at 60Â % max HR. | 1.46 (0.20) | Tri-axial accelerometer: 5-m (accelerated) | 86.9Â % | 76 | 5 |
MULTIMODAL TRAINING | |||||||||
Freiberger (2012) [32] | 3)(MG)Multifaceted group: Strength and balance, cognition training and fall risk education | 16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min. | 1920 | Progressive exertion according BORG scale (not specified) | 0.98 (0.20) | Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated) | 83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions | 76 | 8 |
Kim (2011) [42] | Weight bearing exercise, chair exercise, resistance band exercise, ball exercise, walking ability training | 3 months, 2x p/w 60 min. | 1620 | Not described | 1.10 (0.30) | Stopwatch: ? | 77,4 % (≥15 of 24 sessions) | 79 | 7 |
Freiberger (2007) [30] | Supervised Psychomotor intervention: strength-, balance-, motor coordination-, competence-, and perceptual training | 16Â weeks, 2x p/w; 60Â min. | 1920 | Not described | 1.40 (0.30) | Stopwatch: 8-m (accelerated) | 84Â % | 76 | 7 |
Lazowski (1999) [28] | Supervised multicomponent; strength, balance, flexibility, mobility and function | 4Â months, 3x p/w 45Â min. | 2430 | Self-paced progressive resistance | 0.69 (0.28) | Stopwatch: 7-m (accelerated) | 85-87Â % interv. | 80 | 6 |
79Â % control | |||||||||
Hartmann (2009) [43] | Aerobic exercises, progressive resistance strength training and stretching exercises + additional foot gymnastic exercises at the end of the training session and a 10-min foot gymnastics home-program daily | 12 weeks, 2x p/w supervised 50 min. + 10 min. daily at home | 1200+ 840 = 2040 | Resistance training 2–3 sets of 12 reps. at an intensity of ‘hard; to ‘very hard’(16–18) on the BORG scale | 1.33 (0.19) | DynaPort1MiniMod; tri-axial accelerometer system over 24-m | All subjects completed 24 sessions within 16 weeks | 76 | 6 |
DANCE/ RHYTHMIC COMPONENT | |||||||||
Trombetti (2010) [44] | Supervised progressive multi-task exercises, rhythmic walking | 6Â months, 1x p/w for 60Â min. | 1620 | Progressing difficulty of exercises | 1.04 (0.19) | GAITRite:10-m long electronic gait mat | 78Â % | 76 | 6 |
Granacher (2012) [45] | Salsa dance training with a dance partner | 8 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min. | 960 | Increasing music tempo: 50- > 70 BPM | 1.34 (0.20) | GAITRite: 10-m long electronic gait mat | 92,5 % | 71 | 6 |
Liu-Ambrose (2004) [31] | Agility training; ball games, relay races, dance movements, and obstacle courses | 13Â weeks, 2x p/w 50Â min. | 1300 | Not described | 1.02 (0.19) | Stopwatch: 5-m | 85,4Â % interv. 78.8Â % control | 79 | 5 |
STRETCHING | |||||||||
Kerrigan (2003) [17] | Hip-stretching exercise at home | 10Â weeks, 2x p/d; 5Â min. | 700 | 4 sets of 30Â s. | 1.19 (0.18) | 6-camera motion analysis system (Vicon) | 94Â % | ? | 7 |
Watt (2011) [18] | Daily hip flexor stretching program, which was supervised twice weekly by 2a rehabilitation clinician | 10Â weeks, 2x p/d 4Â min. home program, 2x p/w supervised | 560 | 2 sets of 60Â s. | 1.31 (0.25) | 10-camera motion analysis system (Vicon 624) | 91Â % | 73 | 5 |
Watt (2011) [18] Frail Elderly | Daily hip flexor stretching program, which was supervised twice weekly by a rehabilitation clinician | 10Â weeks, 2x p/d 4Â min home program, 2x p/w supervised | 560 | 2 sets of 60Â s. | 1.15 (0.2) | 10-camera motion analysis system (Vicon 624) | 91Â % | 77 | 5 |
BALANCE | |||||||||
Wolf (2006) [48] | Tai Chi training supplemented with home- based exercise | 48 weeks, 2x p/w; 60–90 min. | 5760-8640 | Progressive duration of 60–90 min | 1.01 (0.48) | Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated) | - | 81 | 7 |
Halvarsson (2011) [47] | Individually adjusted, progressive and specific balance group training | 3Â months, 3x p/w; 60Â min. | 2430 | Progressing demands on the postural control system (5 levels) | 1.11 (0.24) | GAITRite: 8-m long electronic gait mat | 87Â % | 76 | 7 |
REMAINING | |||||||||
Granacher (2013) [49] | Core stability training at moderate intensity | 9Â weeks, 2x p/w; 60Â min | 1080Â min | Progressively, individually increased (lever lengths, ROM, movement velocity, level of stability) | 1.41 (0.14) | 10-m-long electronic gait mat, GAITRite | 92Â % | 71 | 6 |
Tiedeman (2013) [50] | Iyengar-style yoga | 12 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min + 2x p/w 10–20 min at home | 1800 | Gradually increasing difficulty (time, balance) of postures | 1.54 (0.23) | Stopwatch: 4-m (accelerated) from SPPB | 83 % | 68 | 8 |