Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention characteristics of the included studies per sub analysis

From: What type, or combination of exercise can improve preferred gait speed in older adults? A meta-analysis

PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE TRAINING

Study Ascending effect

Intervention

Duration and frequency

Total doses (minutes)

Intensity

Baseline gait speed (mean (SD))

Gait speed test

Exercise compliance

Mean age

Pedro score

Fiatarone (1994) [29]

Progressive resistance exercise training of hip and knee extensors

10 weeks, 3x p/w; 45 min.

1350

80 % of 1 RM

0.51 (0.20)

Stopwatch: 6.1-m course

97 %

87

7

Liu-Ambrose (2004) [31]

Progressive high- intensity resistance training initially set at 50–60 % of 1RM (two sets of 10–15 repetitions) progressing to 75-85 % of 1 RM (two sets of 6–8 repetitions)

13 weeks, 2x p/w 50 min.

1300

Progressing from 50-60 % to 75–85 % of 1RM

1.02 (0.25)

Stopwatch: 5-m

85,4 % interv.

79

5

78.8 % control

Lustosa (2011) [36]

Supervised lower limbs exercises with open chain ankle weights exercises and closed chain body weight exercises

10 weeks, 3x p/w, 60 min.

1800

50-70 % of 1 RM

1.24 (0.14)

Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated)

-

72

7

Persch (2009) [35]

Supervised progressive lower limb strength training

12 weeks, 3x p/w, (estimated at 50 min.)

+/−1800

10-12 maximal reps.

1.23 (0.07)

6-camera motion analysis system (Vicon)

93 %

61

6

Cress (1999) [34]

Supervised combined endurance and strength training

6 months, 3x p/w for 60 min.

4860

75-80 % intensity (1 RM and HRR)

1.46 (0.20)

Stopwatch: 20-m course

80.5 %

76

5

PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE + BALANCE TRAINING

Freiberger (2012) [32]

1)(SB)Strength and balance group: Progressive upper and lower body strength, balance -, and motor coordination training

16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

1920

Progressive exertion according BORG scale (not specified)

0.95 (0.22)

Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated)

83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions

76

8

Yang (2011)

Personalized home balance and strength exercise program (Based on Otago Exercise Program)

6 months, 5x p/w for +/− 20 min. and daily graduated walking program

2700

Progressive adjustments at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after the baseline

1.02 (0.26)

Stopwatch: 6-m (accelerated)

44.1 % 5x p/w

71

7

39 % 3-4x p/w

13.6 % <2x p/w

Arai (2007) [37]

Supervised progressive resistance training and balance training according to ACSM guidelines

3 months, 2x p/w for 90 min.

2430

65-75 % of 1 RM, 10–15 reps.

1.28 (0.24)

Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated)

-

74

5

Gine-Garriga (2010) [38]

Overload functional circuit training focused at functional balance and lower body strength

12 weeks, 2x p/w; 45 min.

1080

Strength training at perceived exertion of 12–14 on the BORG scale increasing from 6–15 reps. Increasing difficulty in balance exercise

0.82 (0.04)

Stopwatch: 8-m couse (accelerated)

90 % interv.

84

6

76 % control

PROGRESSIVE RESISTANCE + BALANCE + ENDURANCE TRAINING

Baker (2007) [40]

Supervised exercise: high-intensity progressive resistance training 3 days per week, moderate-intensity aerobic training 2 days per week, and progressive balance training 1 day per week

10 weeks, 3 to 4 h per week divided over 3 days

5400-7200

80 % of 1RM. Aerobic training: rating of perceived exertion 11 to 14 (20) on the BORG scale

1.23 (0.28)

Ultrasonic transmitter/ receiver over 2-m

90 % (excluding dropouts)

77

7

Barnett (2003) [39]

Supervised exercise consisting of balance, coordination, endurance and strength training + home exercise program based on class content

4 periods over 1 year 1x p/w; 60 min. (37 lessons)

2220

Complexity, speed and resistance were steadily increased over de 4 periods

0.95 (0.30)

Stopwatch: 6-m course

33.7 % attended ≥ 30 of 37 sessions

75

8

Freiberger (2012) [32]

2)(FG)Fitness Group; Strength-, balance -and endurance training

16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

1920

Progressive in duration and exertion according BORG scale (not specified)

0.98 (0.18)

Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated)

83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions

76

8

Freiberger (2007) [30]

Fitness intervention: group and home-based strength, flexibility-, balance and motor coordination-, and endurance training

16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

1920

Not described

1.40 (0.30)

Stopwatch: 8-m (accelerated)

84 %

76

7

Doi (2013) [41]

Supervised multicomponent exercise including aerobic exercise, balance-, strength- and gait training

6 months, 2x p/w for 90 min.

4860

Aerobic exercise and gait-training at 60 % max HR.

1.46 (0.20)

Tri-axial accelerometer: 5-m (accelerated)

86.9 %

76

5

MULTIMODAL TRAINING

Freiberger (2012) [32]

3)(MG)Multifaceted group: Strength and balance, cognition training and fall risk education

16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

1920

Progressive exertion according BORG scale (not specified)

0.98 (0.20)

Stopwatch: 8-m course (accelerated)

83 % attended ≥ 24 of 32 sessions

76

8

Kim (2011) [42]

Weight bearing exercise, chair exercise, resistance band exercise, ball exercise, walking ability training

3 months, 2x p/w 60 min.

1620

Not described

1.10 (0.30)

Stopwatch: ?

77,4 % (≥15 of 24 sessions)

79

7

Freiberger (2007) [30]

Supervised Psychomotor intervention: strength-, balance-, motor coordination-, competence-, and perceptual training

16 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

1920

Not described

1.40 (0.30)

Stopwatch: 8-m (accelerated)

84 %

76

7

Lazowski (1999) [28]

Supervised multicomponent; strength, balance, flexibility, mobility and function

4 months, 3x p/w 45 min.

2430

Self-paced progressive resistance

0.69 (0.28)

Stopwatch: 7-m (accelerated)

85-87 % interv.

80

6

79 % control

Hartmann (2009) [43]

Aerobic exercises, progressive resistance strength training and stretching exercises + additional foot gymnastic exercises at the end of the training session and a 10-min foot gymnastics home-program daily

12 weeks, 2x p/w supervised 50 min. + 10 min. daily at home

1200+ 840 = 2040

Resistance training 2–3 sets of 12 reps. at an intensity of ‘hard; to ‘very hard’(16–18) on the BORG scale

1.33 (0.19)

DynaPort1MiniMod; tri-axial accelerometer system over 24-m

All subjects completed 24 sessions within 16 weeks

76

6

DANCE/ RHYTHMIC COMPONENT

Trombetti (2010) [44]

Supervised progressive multi-task exercises, rhythmic walking

6 months, 1x p/w for 60 min.

1620

Progressing difficulty of exercises

1.04 (0.19)

GAITRite:10-m long electronic gait mat

78 %

76

6

Granacher (2012) [45]

Salsa dance training with a dance partner

8 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min.

960

Increasing music tempo: 50- > 70 BPM

1.34 (0.20)

GAITRite: 10-m long electronic gait mat

92,5 %

71

6

Liu-Ambrose (2004) [31]

Agility training; ball games, relay races, dance movements, and obstacle courses

13 weeks, 2x p/w 50 min.

1300

Not described

1.02 (0.19)

Stopwatch: 5-m

85,4 % interv.

78.8 % control

79

5

STRETCHING

Kerrigan (2003) [17]

Hip-stretching exercise at home

10 weeks, 2x p/d; 5 min.

700

4 sets of 30 s.

1.19 (0.18)

6-camera motion analysis system (Vicon)

94 %

?

7

Watt (2011) [18]

Daily hip flexor stretching program, which was supervised twice weekly by 2a rehabilitation clinician

10 weeks, 2x p/d 4 min. home program, 2x p/w supervised

560

2 sets of 60 s.

1.31 (0.25)

10-camera motion analysis system (Vicon 624)

91 %

73

5

Watt (2011) [18] Frail Elderly

Daily hip flexor stretching program, which was supervised twice weekly by a rehabilitation clinician

10 weeks, 2x p/d 4 min home program, 2x p/w supervised

560

2 sets of 60 s.

1.15 (0.2)

10-camera motion analysis system (Vicon 624)

91 %

77

5

BALANCE

Wolf (2006) [48]

Tai Chi training supplemented with home- based exercise

48 weeks, 2x p/w; 60–90 min.

5760-8640

Progressive duration of 60–90 min

1.01 (0.48)

Stopwatch: 10-m (accelerated)

-

81

7

Halvarsson (2011) [47]

Individually adjusted, progressive and specific balance group training

3 months, 3x p/w; 60 min.

2430

Progressing demands on the postural control system (5 levels)

1.11 (0.24)

GAITRite: 8-m long electronic gait mat

87 %

76

7

REMAINING

Granacher (2013) [49]

Core stability training at moderate intensity

9 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min

1080 min

Progressively, individually increased (lever lengths, ROM, movement velocity, level of stability)

1.41 (0.14)

10-m-long electronic gait mat, GAITRite

92 %

71

6

Tiedeman (2013) [50]

Iyengar-style yoga

12 weeks, 2x p/w; 60 min + 2x p/w 10–20 min at home

1800

Gradually increasing difficulty (time, balance) of postures

1.54 (0.23)

Stopwatch: 4-m (accelerated) from SPPB

83 %

68

8