Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of obesity defined by PBF for sarcopenia parameters according to sex

From: Association of high body mass index, waist circumference, and body fat percentage with sarcopenia in older women

Characteristica

Unadjusted model

Fully adjusted model

Male OR (95% CI)

Female OR (95% CI)

Male OR (95% CI)

Female OR (95% CI)

Muscle strength Low HGS

0.890 (0.498-1.588)

1.888 (0.919-3.880)

2.001 (0.892-4.489)

1.078 (0.580-2.006)

Muscle mass Low ASMI

0.720 (0.470-1.103)

0.726 (0.466-1.133)

0.732 (0.457-1.173)

0.678 (0.415-1.106)

Physical performance Low SPPB

1.624 (0.824-3.202)

1.086 (0.686-1.724)

1.824 (0.865-3.845)

1.189 (0.723 -1.954)

Sarcopeniab

1.587 (0.715-3.523)

0.210** (0.071-0.617)

1.796 (0.716 -4.503)

0.214** (0.068-0.678)

  1. The fully adjusted model was adjusted for age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, alcohol history, location of residence, family group, number of medications, and the MMSE-KC score
  2. Obesity defined by PBF ≥ 28% for men and ≥ 34% for women
  3. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, HGS hand grip strength, ASMI appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, SPPB short physical performance battery
  4. aLow HGS, < 28 kg for males and < 18 kg for females; low ASMI, < 7.0 kg/m2 for males and < 5.4 kg/m2 for females; low SPPB, score ≤ 9 for both sexes
  5. bSarcopenia: low ASMI (< 7.0 kg/m2 for men and < 5.4 kg/m2 for women) and either low HGS (< 28 kg for men and < 18 kg for women) or low physical performance (SPPB score ≤ 9 for both sexes)
  6. *P < 0.05
  7. **P < 0.001