Skip to main content

Barriers to accessing internet-based home Care for Older Patients: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Due to the increasingly ageing society and the shortage of nursing human resources in China, the imbalance between the home care needs of older patients and the inadequate supply of nursing services is increasing. Based on this medical situation, China is implementing internet-based home care (with the nurses who provide this care called online nurses or sharing nurses) based on the concept of the sharing economy, internet technology and knowledge from the home care experience in other countries. Internet-based home care follows an online application/offline service model. Patients place orders through an app, nurses grab orders instantly, and managers dispatch orders through a web platform based on various factors such as nurses’ qualifications, professionalism and distance from the patient. In this way, home care is provided for patients with limited mobility, such as older or disabled patients, patients in rehabilitation and terminal patients. Only by fully understanding the barriers to accessing internet-based home care can we provide quality nursing services to older patients and achieve the sustainable development of internet-based home care.

Objective

The goal of this study was to use qualitative methods to explore barriers to accessing internet-based home care for older patients.

Methods

Based on Levesque’s access to health care framework, semi-structured personal interviews were conducted with 19 older patients in a descriptive qualitative study using directed content analysis.

Results

We identified four barriers to accessing internet-based home care for older patients: barriers to perceiving, seeking, paying for, and engaging in internet-based home care. Specific barriers included traditional perceptions, barriers to internet use, high payment costs, uneven quality of services, and concerns about privacy and patient safety.

Conclusions

Internet-based home care brings new risks and challenges. In order to enable older patients to better enjoy it, it is necessary to strengthen publicity, optimize the network application process, improve the health insurance system, formulate unified nursing service standards, and address safety risks.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

According to the National Bureau of Statistics, by the end of 2017, the number of people aged 60 and above in China was 240 million, with those aged 60 and above accounting for 17.3% of the total population. In addition, 150 million older people suffer from chronic diseases, accounting for 65% of the total older population, and approximately 40 million older people are disabled or semi-disabled, leading to a rapidly growing demand for home care [1, 2]. Home care has become an effective way to cope with ageing in the United States, Canada, Japan and other countries [3,4,5,6]. Home care in China is usually provided by community nurses, but due to the inadequate level of community care and human resources, it is not yet possible to meet the home care needs of the public [7, 8].

The sharing economy refers to a system in which an organization or individual who owns idle resources transferring the right to use the resources to others for a fee; the transferor receives a return, and the sharer creates value by sharing others’ idle resources [9]. Based on this concept, China launched internet-based home care (with the nurses who provide such care being called online nurses or sharing nurses). Internet-based home care is provided by registered nurses from fixed medical institutions, and an online application/offline service model is implemented. Patients place orders through an app, online nurses use idle off-duty time to grab orders instantly, and managers dispatch orders through a web platform based on various factors such as online nurses’ qualifications, professionalism and distance. In this way, home care is provided for people with limited mobility, such as older or disabled patients, patients in rehabilitation and terminal patients [10]. Currently, through patients’ online applications, nurses grab orders from the app, and management dispatches orders, nurses travel to patients’ homes to provide services including routine nursing operations such as intramuscular injections, intravenous injections, urinary catheterization, gastric tube insertion and blood sample collection, as well as specialty care such as Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICC) medication exchange, wound stoma care and neonatal examinations [11].

Internet-based health services mainly use the internet medium for telemedicine intervention or supervision [12,13,14]. China applies internet to home care, as a new service model in which nurses provide nursing care at patients’ homes after grabbing orders via the Internet, Internet-based home care can maximize nurse human resources, meet home care needs, increase nurse salaries, improve nurse professional recognition, etc., but it also increases the new risks and challenges of home care [10, 11]. Both internet-based home care in China and home care in other countries involve nurses coming to patients’ homes to provide home care. The difference between them is that, first, home care in other countries mostly serves established patients, provides continuous nursing services, and creates a stable nurse-patient relationship [15, 16]; on the other hand, in internet-based home care, online nurses accept orders on-demand through a web platform, so each time they meet new patients, provide one-time home care, and must establish a new nurse-patient relationship. Second, home care in other countries is mostly employed by agencies specializing in home care services [17, 18], and nurses are mostly employed full time [19,20,21]. In contrast, In contrast, online nurses are affiliated with hospitals who provide home care on their idle off-duty time, and online nurses are part-time.

For older patients to universally accept and participate in internet-based home care, it is first necessary to understand the factors that may prevent them from using internet-based home care. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand what factors prevent older patients from using internet-based home care. Although previous studies have described the barriers encountered in home care [22, 23], there are no studies of internet-based home care.

Levesque [24] argued that access to health care is multidimensional and includes five dimensions: 1) Approachability, 2) Acceptability, 3) Availability and accommodation, 4) Affordability, 5) Appropriateness, that barriers may be encountered in each dimension of access and that users must have the corresponding capabilities. Levesque identified five corollary dimensions of abilities: 1) ability to perceive, 2) ability to seek, 3) ability to reach, 4) ability to pay, and 5) ability to engage. According to the authors,the ability to perceive is determined by such factors such as health literacy, knowledge about health and beliefs related to health and sickness. The ability to seek health care relates to the concepts of personal autonomy and capacity to choose to seek care, knowledge about health care options and individual rights that would determine expressing the intention to obtain health care. The ability to reach health care relates to the notion of personal mobility and availability of transportation, and occupational flexibility that would enable one person to physically reach service providers. The ability to pay for health care is a widely used concept within the health services and health economics literature. It describes the capacity to generate economic resources - through income, savings, borrowing or loans - to pay for health care services without catastrophic expenditure of resources required for basic necessities. The ability to engage in health care would relate to the participation and involvement of the client in decision-making and treatment decisions, which is in turn strongly determined by capacity and motivation to participate in care and commit to its completion. This dimension is strongly related to the capacity to communicate as well as notions of health literacy, self-efficacy and self-management.

Methods

Design

The study used a qualitative design, and data were collected through semi-structured personal interviews. We obtained approval from the ethics committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. (NO.2016–130).

Sampling and recruitment

The study was conducted in Jinan City, Shandong Province, China. We recruited older patients who were older than 60 years old, were in stable health (exclude older patients with acute and critical illnesses and those whose communication aggravates their condition), and had normal verbal communication skills (exclude older patients with aphasia, extubation, tracheotomy, etc. who communicate physically or with the aid of devices). To ensure the collection a wide range of information, we used the maximum variation strategy to select patients who had placed orders on the online information platform and received internet-based home care services based on their characteristics such as age, gender, education level, type of household, and type of service. In addition, according to the conditions and needs of the older patients, we match older patients who are suitable for internet-based home care but always choose hospital visits.

Data collection procedure

The literature review was designed to provide a systematic understanding of relevant research in order to outline a comprehensive and concise, appropriate interview and an interview outline was initially prepared after thorough discussion among the research team. Two patients were selected for pre-interviews, and the formal interview outline was revised again according to the interview results, as shown in Appendix 1.

All interviews were conducted between November 2020 and April 2021, and the sample size was determined based on the point when data saturation was reached in the interviews. The older patients who had received internet-based home care had limited functionality and limited mobility. We conducted semi-structured interviews with the 13 elderly patients in their homes. For the 7 matched hospital patients, the semi-structured interviews were conducted in hospital wards or outpatient lounges.

Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, and the interview times were agreed upon with the respondents in advance. The researcher established good rapport with the interviewees through the hospital and online platforms in advance, explained the purpose and significance of the study before the interview, and obtained signed informed consent forms from the respondents in which they consented to the interviews being recorded and other issues. During the interview process, the researcher listened carefully, maintained a neutral attitude, encouraged the interviewees to fully express themselves and their ideas, and observed and recorded the non-verbal communication of the interviewees. The interviews were conducted with the interview outline in mind, with appropriate follow-up questions, repetitions, and summaries, and each interview lasted 30 to 60 min. After each interview, the researcher kept a reflective journal to improve the quality of the interview analysis.

Data analysis

Within 24 h of the interviews, the audio recordings were independently transcribed by two researchers, and the data were analysed simultaneously by two researchers,with disagreements or ambiguous concepts discussed as a group. Because this study used Levesque’s access to health care framework as its theoretical framework, the data collection was more structured than what is usual in many other qualitative studies, and the analysis process was more explicit [25, 26]. The analysis was conducted using the directed content analysis method [27, 28], which includes 3 stages: preparation, organization, and reporting. The specific steps were as follows. (1) The unit of analysis was defined, and the sentences that reflected the barriers to older patients’ access to internet-based home care were used as the smallest units of segmentation to form the unit of analysis. (2) The original data were reviewed and read repeatedly. (3) A classification outline was developed based on the model to determine the categories of the unit of analysis.(4) Content coding and categorization were performed; open coding and marking of important ideas and concepts in the data were carried out, and similar codes were grouped into corresponding categories to form themes and sub-themes. (5) The results were interpreted and analysed; links between the data and results were formed, and corresponding excerpt examples from the data were identified.

Results

Participants

Participants’ demographic characteristics are provided in Table 1. Of the 19 participants, approximately half (n = 11) were male, and all were older than 60 years, with an average age of 70 years (range 61 to 82). More than half of the participants had an education level of junior high school or below. More than half of the participants lived in urban communities, and the main types of care services received by the interviewed patients were: replacement of gastric tube, replacement of urinary catheter, PICC medication exchange, intramuscular injection, Intravenous blood collection,etc.

Table 1 Characteristics of the Participants

Themes

Among the barriers to internet-based home care for older patients, the following four themes were identified: (1) barriers to perceiving internet-based home care; (2) barriers to seeking internet-based home care; (3) barriers to paying for internet-based home care; and (4) barriers to engaging in internet-based home care. See Table 2 for details.

Table 2 Themes and Subthemes

Barriers to perceiving internet-based home care

Older patients’ cognition of internet-based home care is biased, such as the formality of the service, its legality, and the type of service recipients. They believe that internet home care lacks formality and is applicable only to patients with limited physical activity who are unable to take care of themselves and have chronic and serious illnesses.

P14: "I am still physically strong and can move freely [ … ] When I get older and can't move, I might choose it."

P16: “The online nurse service is not as reliable as the hospital, and I don't know if it is formal and legal [ … ] I think only seriously ill patients would place orders, just like calling an ambulance."

Due to years of medical perception and habits, older patients tend to adopt traditional coping methods, preferring familiar hospital environments and nurses.

P17: "For each change in medication, I contact Nurse Xiao Liu (Pseudonym) in advance; she is more familiar with me. I come directly to the department, and she changes my medication, forming a habit."

Older patients prefer that their children provide care for them and believe that online nurses do not have enough intimacy with older patients to replace the emotional support given by their children.

P6: "My son used to accompany me on check-ups, and he has been too busy lately [ … ] Although the nurse is very responsible, I feel empty inside without my son's company."

Barriers to seeking internet-based home care

The older patients have limited access to information, mostly through traditional media such as newspapers and TV, and thus do not have sufficient access to information related to internet-based home care.

P13: "I didn't know there were online nurses before, so I called 120 to go to the hospital to change my medicine, and the nurse told me that there was already online nurses. Since then, I've been placing orders online; it's so convenient."

P18: "I haven't heard of online nurses. I haven't heard my son mention it. It's not in the newspapers or on TV. I can't access this information."

With the onset of age and disease, older patients experience a gradual decline in various bodily functions and often have reduced audio-visual function, which affects their use of the internet; for example, they face obstacles in finding web pages, reading text in different fonts, and changing volume levels.

P5: "Due to presbyopia with age, the words on the phone are too small to see clearly; when I look at them a while, my eyes become blurry eyes and start to tear up [ … ] the application process is also more cumbersome."

In addition, because older patients have less access to the internet, poor information technology and a low trust in the internet, they are unable to complete the internet-based home care ordering process, and most of them have their children place orders on their behalf.

P1: "Through the online appointment system, only young people can operate it; the older cannot operate it. Every time, I ask my son to make an appointment[ … ] you can talk to him."

P19: "I have less contact with the internet. I feel unsafe. What if I meet a fraudster online? On the other hand, a hospital visit is safe."

Barriers to paying for internet-based home care

The cost of internet-based home care is relatively expensive, so ordinary families consider it carefully. In addition, there is a lack of standardization of fees, and older patients worry about indiscriminate charges.

P9: "Although internet-based home care provides convenience [ … ] the price charged is expensive, more than 10 times the cost of going to the hospital. It would be good if it could be cheaper."

P3: "At that time, my son downloaded 2 apps, and the fees for each are different; both are quite expensive. What about indiscriminate charges?"

At present, services are paid for by patients themselves and are not yet covered by medical insurance, resulting in a heavy financial burden for patients.

P9: "Currently all services are paid out-of-pocket and are not reimbursable; having the health insurance pay earlier would be better.”

P11: "A lot of hospital visits can be reimbursed by medical insurance[ … ] if internet-based home care could also be included in medical insurance, plus the savings in transportation costs, registration fees, and no need to go to the hospital, it could be very popular."

Barriers to engaging in internet-based home care

At present, internet-based home care is not sufficiently holistic and does not provide appropriate levels of interaction, and the services are limited and administered individually, ignoring the relatedness of chronic diseases and other diseases. In addition, the service hours are generally limited to the daytime, which makes it difficult to meet the diverse needs of patients.

P2: "You may need to place separate orders to change gastric and urinary catheters, and you want to receive infusions at home, but currently there is no such option for placing orders [ … ] so I hope that in the future, you will be able to place orders based on diseases and include a variety of care services rather than being limited to a certain operation."

P4: "Generally, you have to place orders during the day; no one takes orders at night. That is very annoying. Once, I placed an order at night, and the nurse said her home was nearby [so she would complete the visit], but she said that she generally does not take orders so late."

Because internet-based home care is provided as a single, transient service, the continuity of nursing care is not sufficient. When the nurse leaves the patient’s home, it is difficult to deal with other nursing needs or adverse reactions. Although each information platform has a “question consultation” or “online chat” function, the feedback from patients after consultation is not timely due to network delays, a lack of fixed personnel and the business of clinical work.

P8: "The nurse leaves after the service, unlike in the hospital where you can always ask the nurse if you have questions"

P7: "Although you can communicate with the nurses through cell phones, there may be delays in communicating over the internet; plus, the nurses are busy and may not look at their phones in time, so the feedback is not very timely."

Older patients are concerned about personal information being leaked. This is especially true in regard to personal information sharing and the online nurses’ use of video recording during their work so that the entire process can be traced.

P11: "When applying you need to fill in personal information, service needs and information about your illness; all nurses are able to see my information [ … ] if the information were to be used by unscrupulous people, the consequences would be serious."

P8: "Video recordings are taken during the procedures. I feel very uncomfortable; it is a bit of an invasion of my privacy [ … ] I had raised comments, and the nurse said the platform requires it and did not look into it deeper."

Older patients are highly concerned about safety issues and have concerns and worries about the quality and efficiency of internet-based home care and the quality of nurses. In addition, it is difficult for the home environment to meet the same requirements of the hospital environment, and the lack of timely assistance from others in case of operation failure and the lack of timely support from a medical team in handling emergencies leads to a lack of patient safety.

P10: "The level of skill of each nurse is different; I remember a nurse who liked to smile and make people feel warm, and she was also skilled and worked more smoothly than others [ … ] it would be good if every nurse could do it [like her]."

P1: "For a long time need, my gastric tube needed to be changed to my other nostril. The nurse tried several times without success and later found an old nurse, and it was finally solved [ … ] a lot suffering, and the experience was very bad."

P4: "There is a big difference between home and hospital [ … ] if there is an unexpected situation, it is difficult for the nurse to handle it alone, and safety is not guaranteed."

Discussion

Principal findings

In this paper, we explored the barriers to accessing internet-based home care for older patients using Levesque’s access to health care framework and identified four barriers to home care for older patients: barriers to perceiving internet-based home care, barriers to perceiving internet-based home care, barriers to paying for internet-based home care and barriers to engaging in internet-based home care. According to Levesque’s access to care framework [24], which concerns routine patient hospital visits, patients do not need to arrive at the hospital to receive internet-based home care, and no specific barriers are present in reaching internet-based home care.

Older patients’ traditional perceptions of medical care and cognitive biases about internet-based home care have a significant impact on their perceptions of internet-based home care. The subjective perceptions of older patients that internet-based home care lacks formality and is mostly for seriously ill patients, coupled with the fact that older people are less likely to use the internet as a communication tool for health-related matters [29, 30], has led to low acceptance of the new industry of internet-based home care by older patients. Only by strengthening comprehensive health education and making older patients correctly understand the connotation and importance of internet-based home care can we improve their sense of identification with the service and stimulate their potential demand. In addition, because internet-based home care cannot replace the emotional support provided by children, older patients tend to prefer their children’s care, which not only increases their children’s caregiving burden [31, 32] but also may negatively affect the physical health of older patients due to their children’s low professional quality [33, 34].

Currently, information is mostly sought through online media, but online social media is not widely used among older patients [35], which, combined with older patients’ own limited internet technology and low trust in the internet, leads to insufficient access to medical information for older patients. It is imperative to enhance the publicity of internet-based home care in a way that is appealing to older patients and to make more older patients aware of online nurses. In addition, with age and disease, older patients’ bodily functions, such as memory, vision, and sense of touch, gradually decline, resulting in significant barriers to their use of network devices and mobile smart apps, such as their ability to perform webpage searches, read text in different fonts, and change the volume leve [36]. The operating interface of smart apps should be simplified according to the feedback of older patients to improve the experience of older patients. Another important finding is that older patients often share control and decision-making power over internet-based home care with family members to help cope with this complex situation [37, 38]. This tendency can facilitate the application of internet-based home care in the older patient population.

The high cost of internet-based home care is an important factor that hinders its promotion. Because factors such as transportation cost and time cost must be considered in internet-based home care, the cost is many times higher than that of regular hospital visits; there is no uniform standard for service item charges; and most costs are determined by the platform according to the service item, service time and service distance [10]. At present, internet-based home care is paid completely out of pocket by patients and services are not reimbursed by medical insurance, so there is a contradiction between residents’ demand for services and their ability to pay. We can learn from Japan, Germany, and other ageing countries that incorporate home care into a separate long-term care insurance system [39, 40] or from the U.S. integrated care model in which Medicare pays for home care on a per capita basis [41]. In addition, we should fully consider the role of the market and build a price mechanism that is suitable for the local area to maximize the interests of both nurses and patients and ensure the accessibility of internet-based home care.

There is a gap between the current internet-based home care and the market demand in terms of service items, service time, and service continuity, and many improvements need to be made to form comprehensive, coordinated, and high-quality internet-based home care [42, 43]. In addition, most internet-based home care involves the use of video recordings to document the whole service process, and a balance between ensuring the safety of nursing patients and protecting patients’ personal privacy needs to be achieved [44, 45]. Finally, safety is a central issue in the home care of older patients [46, 47]. Currently, the quality of nursing services varies, and there is a risk of nurses having insufficiently accurate and complete patient information; moreover, nurses mostly provide care alone, and when nurses encounter changes in a patient’s condition or require emergency assistance, they may not be able to implement effective treatment due to their lack of personal competence, lack of prescribing authority, lack of emergency equipment, and lack of medical team support, thus endangering patients’ lives [48, 49]. In the future, we must also improve the training system, develop implementation rules and clear processes, establish a quality control system, and improve emergency access to ensure patient safety.

Limitations

First, although we succeeded in collecting a diverse and disparate sample to reach information saturation, the participants had certain geographical limitations, all from Jinan, Shandong Province, and were underrepresented for other regions. Second, although participants who received Internet home care were matched with hospital participants, the differences in experience between them were not significant. Finally, we explored barriers from the perspective of older patients only, and further exploration from the perspective of younger patients, nurses, and caregivers is necessary.

Conclusions

Internet-based home care brings new risks and challenges. In order to enable older patients to better enjoy it, it is necessary to strengthen publicity, optimize the network application process, improve the health insurance system, formulate unified nursing service standards, and address safety risks.

Availability of data and materials

The results/data/figures in this manuscript have not been published elsewhere, nor are they under consideration by another publisher.

References

  1. 1.

    XINHUA. Internet-plus nursing program offers convenience to patients [EB/OL]. [2021.4.10]. http://en.nhc.gov.cn/2019-03/22/c_74874.htm.

  2. 2.

    CN C C. Healthcare plan launches in six pilot areas [EB/OL]. [2020.4.10]. http://en.nhc.gov.cn/2019-02/14/c_74241.htm.

  3. 3.

    Johnson S, Bacsu J, Abeykoon H, et al. No place like home: a systematic review of home Care for Older Adults in Canada [J]. Can J Aging. 2018;37(4):400–19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1017/S0714980818000375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leff B, Weston CM, Garrigues S, et al. Home-based primary care practices in the United States: current state and quality improvement approaches [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(5):963–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jgs.13382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Genet N, Boerma WG, Kringos DS, et al. Home care in Europe: a systematic literature review [J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):207. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1472-6963-11-207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morioka N, Okubo S, Yumoto Y, et al. Training opportunities and the increase in the number of nurses in home-visit nursing agencies in Japan: a panel data analysis [J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):398. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-019-4225-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhu H, Lu J, Zhang Y, et al. Responses to population ageing in the new era: a national condition report from China [J]. China Popul Dev Stud. 2019;2(3):272–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s42379-018-0017-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chow SK, Wong FK, Chan TM, et al. Community nursing services for postdischarge chronically ill patients [J]. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(7B):260–71. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02231.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Markman GD, Lieberman M, Leiblein M, et al. The Distinctive Domain of the Sharing Economy: Definitions, Value Creation, and Implications for Research [J]. J Manag Stud. 2021.

  10. 10.

    Sheng Z, Wang J, Sun K, et al. Nurses' attitudes toward internet-based home care: a survey study [J]. Comput Inform Nurs. 2020;39(2):97–104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang R, Xu M, Li X, et al. Internet-based sharing nurse program and Nurses' perceptions in China: cross-sectional survey [J]. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e16644. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2196/16644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Berger T, Bur O, Krieger T. [Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions][J]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019;69(9–10):413–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1055/a-0963-9055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang Q, Lee R, Hunter S, et al. The effectiveness of internet-based telerehabilitation among patients after total joint arthroplasty: an integrative review [J]. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;115:103845. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews [J]. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736–71. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elliott B. A day in the life of a home care nurse in Hawaii [J]. Home Healthc Nurse. 2014;32(8):503–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liebel DV, Powers BA, Hauenstein EJ. Home health care nurse interactions with homebound geriatric patients with depression and disability [J]. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2015;8(3):130–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3928/19404921-20150105-01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Daugherty JD, Eiring H, Blake S, et al. Disaster preparedness in home health and personal-care agencies: are they ready?[J]. Gerontology. 2012;58(4):322–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1159/000336032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Franzosa E, Tsui EK. Professional, friend or family?: how home care companies sell emotional care [J]. J Women Aging. 2020;32(4):440–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/08952841.2020.1763894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Oh EG, Lee HJ, Kim Y, et al. [current status of home visit programs: activities and barriers of home care nursing services][J]. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015;45(5):742–51. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.5.742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tourangeau A, Patterson E, Rowe A, et al. Factors influencing home care nurse intention to remain employed [J]. J Nurs Manag. 2014;22(8):1015–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jonm.12104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bayer B. A day in the life of a New Orleans home care nurse [J]. Home Healthc Now. 2018;36(4):265–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Heydari H, Shahsavari H, Hazini A, et al. Exploring the barriers of home Care Services in Iran: a qualitative study [J]. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:2056470–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2016/2056470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    de Graaff FM, Francke AL. Home care for terminally ill Turks and Moroccans and their families in the Netherlands: carers’ experiences and factors influencing ease of access and use of services [J]. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(8):797–805. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00078-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Levesque J F, Harris M F, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations [J]. Int J Equity Health, 2013,12: 18, 1, DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18.

  25. 25.

    Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data [J]. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kelly M. The role of theory in qualitative health research [J]. Fam Pract. 2010;27(3):285–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/fampra/cmp077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process [J]. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J]. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/1049732305276687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Mastalerz-Migas A. Usage of medical internet and e-health services by the elderly [J]. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;834:75–80. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/5584_2014_74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Quittschalle J, Stein J, Luppa M, et al. Internet use in old age: results of a German population-representative survey [J]. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e15543. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2196/15543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen MC, Kao CW, Chiu YL, et al. Effects of home-based long-term care services on caregiver health according to age [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jawahir S, Tan EH, Tan YR, et al. The impacts of caregiving intensity on informal caregivers in Malaysia: findings from a national survey [J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):391. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-021-06412-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Van DT, Macq J, Jeanmart C, et al. Tools for measuring the impact of informal caregiving of the elderly: a literature review [J]. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(4):490–504. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bom J, Bakx P, Schut F, et al. The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review [J]. Gerontologist. 2019;59(5):e629–42. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/geront/gny137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Walker J, Crotty BH, O'Brien J, et al. Addressing the challenges of aging: how elders and their care partners seek information [J]. Gerontologist. 2017;57(5):955–62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/geront/gnw060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, et al. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders [J]. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(9):624–35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Crotty BH, Walker J, Dierks M, et al. Information sharing preferences of older patients and their families [J]. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1492–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Taylor JO, Hartzler AL, Osterhage KP, et al. Monitoring for change: the role of family and friends in helping older adults manage personal health information [J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(8):989–99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jamia/ocy037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Geraedts M, Heller GV, Harrington CA. Germany's long-term-care insurance: putting a social insurance model into practice [J]. Milbank Q. 2000;78(3):375–401, 340. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/1468-0009.00178.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Olivares-Tirado P, Tamiya N, Kashiwagi M. Effect of in-home and community-based services on the functional status of elderly in the long-term care insurance system in Japan [J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):239. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1472-6963-12-239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hirth V, Baskins J, Dever-Bumba M. Program of all-inclusive care (PACE): past, present, and future [J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009;10(3):155–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jamda.2008.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Walters K, Frost R, Kharicha K, et al. Home-based health promotion for older people with mild frailty: the HomeHealth intervention development and feasibility RCT [J]. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(73):1–128. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3310/hta21730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Swihart D. Finding common ground: Interprofessional collaborative practice competencies in patient-centered medical homes [J]. Nurs Adm Q. 2016;40(2):103–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Alkhatib S, Waycott J, Buchanan G, et al. Privacy and the internet of things (IoT) monitoring solutions for older adults: a review [J]. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;252:8–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dostálová V, Bártová A, Bláhová H, et al. The needs of older people receiving home care: a scoping review [J]. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(3):495–504. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40520-020-01505-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Åkerlind C, Martin L, Gustafsson C. eHomecare and safety: the experiences of older patients and their relatives [J]. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(2):178–85. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Romagnoli KM, Handler SM, Hochheiser H. Home care: more than just a visiting nurse [J]. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(12):972–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Craven C, Byrne K, Sims-Gould J, et al. Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: staff perspectives [J]. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(5):525–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/intqhc/mzs047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Johannessen T, Ree E, Aase I, et al. Exploring challenges in quality and safety work in nursing homes and home care - a case study as basis for theory development [J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):277. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12913-020-05149-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Confirmed by all authors.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Baosheng Zhao was responsible for designing the study, conducting the interviews, interpreting the data and drafting the text. Xiaoman Zhang was responsible for conducting the interviews and interpreting the data. Rendong Huang was responsible for interpreting the data. Mo Yi was responsible for interpreting the data. Xiaofei Dong was responsible for interpreting the data. Zhenxiang Li was responsible for designing the study, critical review of the intellectual content of the article, support and guidance. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenxiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained approval from the ethics committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. (NO.2016–130). All participants gave informed consent to participate in this study. The study performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publication.

Competing interests

I declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by BMC, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1.

Interview Outline.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Zhang, X., Huang, R. et al. Barriers to accessing internet-based home Care for Older Patients: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 21, 565 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12877-021-02474-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Internet
  • Home care
  • Online nurses
  • Older patients
  • Barriers
  • Qualitative study