Skip to main content

Table 2 Potential protective factors for cognitive impairment in the oldest-old

From: Resilience to cognitive impairment in the oldest-old: design of the EMIF-AD 90+ study

Domain

Potential protective factor

Study

Agea

Sample size (N)

Outcome variable

Result

Cognitive reserve

High level of education

H85 Gothenburg study [18]

85.7 (±0.05)

No dementia: 794

Dementia: 271

Dementia

Protective

The 90+ Study [4]

94 (90–106)

No dementia: 536

Dementia: 375

Dementia

Protective

Vantaa 85+ Study [17]

88.4 (85.0–104.0)

No incident dementia: 239

Incident dementia: 100

Incident dementia

Protective

High cognitive activity

The 90+ Study [16]

93 (90–103)

No incident dementia: 319

Incident dementia: 268

Incident dementia

Equivocal

Vascular comorbidity

Low total/LDL or high HDL cholesterol level

Leiden 85-plus Study [20]

85 (85)

No dementia: 488

Dementia: 73

Cognition

Dementia

Equivocal

Newcastle 85+ Study [19]

85 (85)

No dementia: 767

Dementia: 78

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Equivocal

NonaSantfeliu study [21]

94.3 (±2.6)

62, dementia status unknown

Cognition

No effect

Octabaix study [22]

85 (85)

321, dementia status unknown

Cognition

No effect

PLAD [15]

93.6 (90–108)

No cognitive impairment: 300

Cognitive impairment: 409

Cognition

No effect

Vantaa 85+ Study [17]

88.4 (85.0–104.0)

No incident dementia: 239

Incident dementia: 100

Incident dementia

No effect

Absence of hypertension

Leiden 85-plus Study [23]

85 (85)

572, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Risk

Newcastle 85+ Study [19]

85 (85)

No dementia: 767

Dementia: 78

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Equivocal

PLAD [27]

93.6 (90–108)

No cognitive impairment: 317

Cognitive impairment: 465

Cognition

No effect

Umeå 85+ study [26]

85, 90 and ≥ 95

No dementia: 342

Dementia: 233

Cognition

Dementia

Protective

Umeå 85+ study [25]

88.8 (±4.1)

No incident dementia: 136

Incident dementia: 69

Incident dementia

No effect

The 90+ Study [24]

93.2 (90–103)

No incident dementia: 335

Incident dementia: 224

Incident dementia

Risk

Vantaa 85+ Study [17]

88.4 (85.0–104.0)

No incident dementia: 239

Incident dementia: 100

Incident dementia

Equivocal

Absence of DM

Leiden 85-plus Study [30]

85 (85)

596, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Equivocal

Octabaix study [31]

85 (85)

167, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

No effect

Vantaa 85+ Study [11]

≥85

No incident dementia: 249

Incident dementia: 106

Incident dementia

Protective

Absence of stroke

H85 Gothenburg study [18]

85.7 (±0.05)

No dementia: 794

Dementia: 271

Dementia

Protective

Vantaa 85+ Study [32]

88.4 (±2.9)

No dementia: 339

Dementia: 214

Incident dementia: 100

Dementia

Incident dementia

Protective

Absence of AF

Vantaa 85+ Study [32]

88.4 (±2.9)

No dementia: 339

Dementia: 214

Incident dementia: 100

Dementia

Incident dementia

No effect

Mood and sleep

No depression

Leiden 85-plus Study [34]

85 (85)

500, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Protective

Umeå 85+ study [14]

85, 90 and 95–103

No dementia: 173

Dementia: 69

Dementia

Protective

High sleep quality

PLAD [35]

93.5 (±3.4)

No dementia: 251

Dementia: 409

Dementia

Cognition

Protective

Sensory system

Absence of visual impairment

Leiden 85-plus Study [37]

85 (85)

459, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Protective

Newcastle 85+ Study [38]

85 (85)

No dementia: 771

Dementia: 68

Cognition

Protective

Absence of glaucoma or cataract

Newcastle 85+ Study [105]

85 (85)

No dementia: 771

Dementia: 68

Cognition

Equivocal

Absence of hearing impairment

Leiden 85-plus Study [37]

85 (85)

459, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Equivocal

Physical performance and capacity

Good physical performance

Leiden 85-plus Study [40]

85 (85)

555, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Protective

The 90+ Study [41]

93.3 (±2.6)

No incident dementia: 366

Incident dementia: 212

Incident dementia

Protective

High physical activity

The 90+ Study [16]

93 (90–103)

No incident dementia: 319

Incident dementia: 268

Incident dementia

No effect

Genetics

Absence of APOEε4 and/or presence of APOEε2

Danish 1905 birth cohort [42]

93.1 (±0.3)

1551, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

No effect

Leiden 85-plus Study [43]

89.0 (87.4–91.2)b

No dementia: 242

Dementia: 78

Dementia

Protective

The 90+ Study [44]

93.7 (90–105)

No dementia: 566

Dementia: 236

Incident dementia: 188

Dementia

Incident dementia

Equivocal

Vantaa 85+ Study [45]

≥85

313 without dementia

197 with dementia

Dementia

Protective

Vantaa 85+ Study [46]

≥85

No incident dementia: 187

Incident dementia: 58

Incident dementia

Cognitive decline

No effect

MnSOD, GLRX, GSTP1, MT1A, NDUFV1, PRDX3, UQCRFS1, PICALM

Danish 1905 birth cohort [106,107,108]

92-93c

1089–1650, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Protective

ACOX1

Danish 1905 birth cohort [106]

93.2 (92.7–93.8)

1089, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Risk

Cytokine genes, CLU

Danish 1905 birth cohort [108,109,110]

92-93c

1380–1651, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Equivocal

MTHFR, MTR

Danish 1905 birth cohort [111]

93.1 (±0.3)

1651, dementia status unknown

Cognition

Cognitive decline

No effect

KLOTHO

PLAD [112]

93.5 (90–108)

No cognitive impairment: 236

Cognitive impairment: 470

Cognition

Protective

PPAR-γ2

PLAD [113]

93.7 (90–108)

No cognitive impairment: 257

Cognitive impairment: 475

Cognition

No effect

LRP, LPL, ACE

Vantaa 85+ Study [114]

≥85

No dementia: 203

Dementia (AD): 113

Dementia

No effect

Hallmarks of ageing

Low level of inflammation markers

Leiden 85-plus Study [49]

85 (85)

No dementia: 491

Cognition

Cognitive decline

Equivocal

The 90+ Study [50]

94.3 (90–105)

No dementia: 232

Dementia: 73

Dementia

Equivocal

The 90+ Study [51]

93.9 (90–102)

No incident dementia: 145

Incident dementia: 82

Incident dementia

No effect

Low level of senescence markers

Leiden 85-plus Study [52]

89.8 (85–101)

No dementia: 452

Dementia: 146

Incident dementia: unknown

Cognition

Dementia

Incident dementia

No effect

Markers of neurodegeneration

Normal levels of Aβ and tau in CSF

H85 Gothenburg study [56]

85 (85)

No incident dementia: 28

Incident dementia: 7

Incident dementia

Protective

Negative amyloid PET-scan

The 90+ Study [57]

94.2 (90–99)d

No incident dementia: 10

Incident dementia: 3

Cognitive decline

Protective

Less brain atrophy

H85 Gothenburg study [58]

85 (85)

No dementia: 30

Dementia: 23

Dementia

Equivocal

Less WMH

H85 Gothenburg study [59]

85 (85)

No dementia: 133

Dementia: 103

Dementia

Protective

High white matter integrity

The 90+ Study [60]

94.6 (90–103)

Normal: 64

CIND: 30

CIND

No effect

  1. Aβ Amyloid β, AD Alzheimer’s disease, APOE Apolipoprotein E, CIND Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DM diabetes mellitus, HDL high-density lipoproteins, LDL low-density lipoproteins, MCI Mild Cognitive Impairment, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, N Number, PET positron emission tomography, PLAD Project of Longevity and Aging in Dujangyan, WMH white matter hyperintensities
  2. aMean age (range, if available, or ± if standard deviation) in years at baseline, unless stated otherwise; bMedian age (interquartile range, IQR) in years; cMinimal and maximum mean age in years of the studies referred to; dMedian age (range) in years