Skip to main content

Table 3 Model– estimated mean difference between groups, per protocol, as-treated and CACE estimates analysis

From: Effect of exercise and nutritional supplementation on health-related quality of life and mood in older adults: the VIVE2 randomized controlled trial

 

Model 1a

Model 2b

PCS

 Complete case

− 0.47 (− 2.81, 1.86) p 0.7

− 0.36 (− 2.73, 2.02) p 0.77

 PP

−0.35 (−2.86, 2.15) p 0.78

− 0.26 (− 2.82, 2.29) p 0.84

 As-treated

− 0.21 (− 2.68, 2.26) p 0.87

−0.13 (− 2.65, 2.39) p 0.92

 CACE

− 0.27 (− 2.58, 2.04) p 0.82

−0.16 (− 2.48, 2.15) p 0. 89

MCS

 Complete case

−2.23 (− 5.13,0.66) p 0.13

−2.19 (− 5.14, 0.76) p 0.14

 PP

− 2.09 (− 5.09, 0.91) p 0.17

−2.13 (− 5.18, 0.91) p 0.17

 As- treated

−1.95 (− 4.91, 1.00) p 0.19

−1.96 (− 4.98, 1.03) p 0.19

 CACE

− 1.89 (−4.72, 0.93) p 1.19

−1.87 (− 4.7, 0.96) p 0.19

CES-D

 Complete case

0.72 (−1.49, 2.93) p 0.52

0.79 (−1.39, 2.98) p 0.48

 PP

0.22 (− 2.15, 2.58) p 0.86

0.17 (− 2.16, 2.51) p 0.88

 As-treated

0.08 (− 2.22, 2.38) p 0.95

0.09 (− 2.17, 2.36) p 0.94

 CACE

0.44 (−1.73, 2.62) p 0.69

0.54 (−1.58, 2.67) p 0.62

  1. Model– estimated mean difference at 6 months between groups (95% CI) for PCS, MCS and CES-D and the analysis for per protocol, as-treated and CACE estimates
  2. CI confidence interval, PCS physical component summary, MCS mental component summary, CES-D the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, PP per protocol, CACE complier average causal effect
  3. aadjusted for baseline value
  4. badjustments for baseline, age, sex and study site. A minus sign indicates lower results in the intervention group