Skip to main content

Table 1 Details and HGS protocols of the studies that diagnose sarcopenia, included in this systematic review

From: Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty - a systematic review

Study details

Author

Sample

Size

Age

Dynamometer

Repetitions

Hand

Posture

Shoulder position

Elbow position

Wrist position

Handle position

Encouragement

Acquisition time

Rest time

HGS analysis

Cut-off values

Cross-sectional study

Toulouse and Lyon, France

Abellan van Kan et al. [52]

Community-dwelling older women from the EPIDOS cohort

3025

≥75

Martin vigorimeter, Medizin Tecnik, Tuttlingen, Germany

3

Dominant

Standing upright

Adducted

180°

–

Adjusted to a comfortable position

–

–

–

Higher value

Lowest 25%

Cross-sectional study

Turkey

Akin et al. [53]

Community-dwelling older adults from KEHES Study

879

≥60

Takei TKK

5401 digital handgrip dynamometer, Takei, Niigata-City, Japan

3

Dominant

Standing upright

Adducted

90°

–

–

–

–

–

Higher value

Fried’s criteria*

Cross-sectional study

S. Paulo, Brazil

Alexandre Tda et al. [54]

Older urban population from the SABE Study

1149

≥60

Takei Kiki Kogyo TK 1201, Tokyo, Japan

2

Dominant

Sitting position

–

Resting on the table (forearms too)

Palms facing up

Adjusted to a comfortable position

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Milan, Italy

Barichella et al. [55]

Consecutive patients from a specialised tertiary care center

364

≥65

DynEx digital hand dynamometer, Akern/MD Systems, Florence, Italy

3

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

–

–

–

–

Mean value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

The Netherlands

Bastiaanse et al. [56] (a)

Adults with intellectual disabilities from the HA-ID study

884

≥50

Jamar hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston Rolyan, USA

6

Both

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

2nd

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Liège, Belgium

Beaudart et al. [57] (d)

Consecutive outpatients from an osteoporotic and geriatric department of a clinic and community-dwelling older adults

250

≥65

Hydraulic and pneumatic dynamometer Saehan Corporation, MSD Europe, Bvba, Belgium

(calibrated)

6

Both

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral position, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Liège, Belgium

Beaudart et al. [58] (d)

Community-dwelling older adults from the SarcoPhAge study

534

≥65

Hydraulic dynamometer Saehan Corporation, MSD Europe, Bvba, Belgium

(calibrated)

6

Both

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral position, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

The Netherlands

Bijlsma et al. [59]

Young and healthy older Europeans from the Leiden Longevity Study

654

38–82

Jamar hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston Inc., Bolingbrook, IL, USA

3

Dominant

Standing upright

Abducted

180°

–

Adjusted to hand size

(middle phalanx rested on the inner handle)

–

–

–

Higher value

M: <30.3 kgf

W: <19.3 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Leiden, The Netherlands; Jyvaskyla, Finland; Tartu, Estonia; Paris, France and Manchester, United Kingdom (UK)

Bijlsma et al. [60]

Middle to older participants from the MYOAGE study

452

18–30/ 69–81

Jamar hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston, Inc., Bolingbrook, IL, USA

6

Both

Standing upright

Abducted

180°

–

Adjusted to hand size

–

–

–

Higher value

**

Cross-sectional study

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Campbell et al. [61]

Assisted-living older adults

40

≥65

Vernier digital hand dynamometer and collected using LoggerPro software, Vernier, OR, USA; 60 Hz

6

Both

Sitting position

Adducted

90°

Dynamometer vertical

–

Yes

Self-selected pace

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Prospective cohort study

Northern Italy

Cerri et al. [62]

Consecutively admitted older inpatients of an Acute Geriatric Clinic, S. Gerardo University Hospital

103

≥65

Jamar hand dynamometer

3

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted

90°

Forearm neutral

Between 0 and 30° extension

–

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Madrid and Barcelona, Spain

Cuesta et al. [63] (a)

Geriatric outpatients from the ELLI study

298

≥70

Jamar hand dynamometer

3

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

2nd

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Midwestern United States of America (USA)

Fukuda et al. [64]

Caucasian ambulatory individuals

107

65–89

DHS-176 digital handgrip dynamometer, Detecto, Webb City, MO

3

Dominant

Standing upright

Adducted

90°

–

–

–

3 to 5 s

–

Mean value

**

Cross-sectional study

Spain

Garatachea et al. [65]

Caucasian community-dwelling older adults from two geriatric nursing homes

81

71–93

Smedley digital hand dynamometer, Sportstek,VIC, Australia

3

Non-dominant

Standing upright

Abducted

180°

–

Adjusted to hand size

–

–

30 to 60 s

Higher value

**

Prospective cohort study

Spain

Gonzalez-Montalvo et al. [66]

Consecutive patients hospitalised for hip fracture in a public 1300-bed university hospital

509

≥65

Jamar hydraulic dynamometer, Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL, USA

3

Dominant

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

USA

Gray et al. [67]

Community-dwelling older adults

43

≥65

Takei Scientific Instruments digital grip strength dynamometer, Niigata City,

Japan

3

Preferred hand

Standing upright

–

Arms down by the side

Neutral

Interphalangeal joint

of the index finger maintained at 90°

Yes

Minimum of 3 s

1 min

Higher value

**

Cross-sectional study

Taipei, Taiwan

Han et al. [68]

Healthy volunteers from the Taiwan Fitness for Seniors Study

878

≥65

Baseline hydraulic dynamometer, Fabrication Enterprises Inc., Irvington, NY, USA

3

Dominant

–

Adducted

90°

Forearm neutral

–

–

–

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

6th district of Tehran, Iran

Hashemi et al. [69] (c)

Community-dwelling individuals from the SARIR study

300

≥55

Baseline pneumatic

squeeze bulb dynamometer, Jamar, Inc. USA: c7489–02 Rolyan

(calibrated)

6

Both

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

2nd

–

–

30 s

Mean value

Compared with normative data from Merkies et al. [70]

Cross-sectional study

Northern Bavaria, Germany

Kemmler et al. [71]

Community-dwelling German women from the FORMoSA study

1325

≥70

Jamar hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston Inc., Bollington, USA

2

Both

Standing upright

–

Arms down by the side

–

Adjusted to hand size

–

–

–

Higher value

W: <20 kgf

Prospective cohort study

I-Lan County, Taiwan

Lee et al. [72]

Young healthy volunteers and older adults from the I-Lan Longitudinal Ageing Study

508

20–40/ ≥65

Smedley hand dynamometer, TTM, Tokyo, Japan

3

Dominant

Standing upright

Abducted

180°

–

–

–

–

–

Higher value

M: <22.4 kgf

W: <14.3 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Korea

Lee et al. [73] (b)

Ambulatory women from the University Hospital Menopause Clinic

196

≥65

Jamar hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston Inc., Bolingbrook, IL, USA

3

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Between 0 and 30° dorsiflexion

2nd

–

–

–

Mean value

W: <18 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Tamana, Japan

Maeda et al. [74]

Patients admitted to acute phase wards from Tamana Regional Health Medical Center

224

≥65

Smedley hand dynamometer, TTM, Tokyo, Japan

2

Dominant

Standing or sitting position, depending on their ability

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Higher value

M: <26 kgf

W: <18 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Martinez et al. [75]

Hospitalised elderly patients in a multi-specialty hospital

110

≥60

Saehan hydraulic dynamometer, Saehan Corporation, 973, Yangdeok-Dong, Masan 630–728, Korea

3

–

Sitting position

–

90°

–

–

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Guelph, Canada

McIntosh et al. [76]

Community-dwelling older adults

85

≥65

Vernier digital hand dynamometer and collected using LoggerPro software, Vernier, OR, USA; 60 Hz

6

Both

Standing upright

Adducted

90°

–

–

Yes

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Prospective cohort study

Reykjavik, Iceland

Mijnarends et al. [77]

Community-dwelling older adults from the AGES-Reykjavik Study

2309

66–93

Good Strength

software, Metitur, Finland

3

Dominant

Sitting position

Relaxed

90°, neutral

Attached by belts to a strain-gauge system, thumb up

–

Yes

4–5 s

30 s

–

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Prospective cohort study

Seongnam, Korea

Moon et al. [78]

Community-dwelling older adults from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging

297

≥65

Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston,

Bolingbrook, IL, USA

2

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted

90°

Forearm neutral

–

Adjusted

to a comfortable position

–

–

1 min

Mean value

M: <26 kgf

W: <16 kgf

Cross-sectional study

London, Ontario, Canada

Morat et al. [79]

Healthy and independent living older adults from the

Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging

24

≥65

Smedley hand

dynamometer, TTM, Tokyo, 100 kg

6

Both

Standing upright

–

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

–

–

–

 

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Goiâna, Brazil

Pagotto et al. [80] (b)

Community-dwelling older adults

132

≥60

CROWN hydraulic

dynamometer

2

Dominant

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Extended between 0 and 30° dorsiflexion

2nd

–

6 s

1 min

Both values

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

and

Fried’s criteria*

Cross-sectional study

UK

Patel et al. [81] (d)

Community-dwelling older adults from the Hertfordshire Sarcopenia Study

1890

68–77

Jamar hand dynamometer

6

Both

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Pavia, Italy

Rondanelli et al. [82]

Older adults consecutively admitted to a physical medicine and rehabilitation division, in Santa Margherita institute

159

≥65

Jamar 5030 J1 hydraulic hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston Rolyan, Bolingbrook, IL,USA

4

–

Sitting position

–

Comfortable arm position

–

–

Yes

5 s

1 min

Mean value of the last three efforts

**

Prospective cohort study

Barcelona, Spain

Sanchez-Rodriguez et al. [83] (d)

Consecutive hospitalised

patients from a postacute care geriatric unit

100

≥70

Jamar hand dynamometer, Nottinghamshire, UK

3

–

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

Compared with normative data from Luna-Heredia et al. [16]

Retrospective cohort study

Kuopio, Eastern Finland

Sjoblom et al. [84]

Finnish postmenopausal women from the OSTPRE study

590

65–72

Pneumatic hand-held dynamometer Martin Vigorimeter, Germany

3

–

Sitting position

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Mean value

Lowest 25%

Cross-sectional study

Porto, Portugal

Sousa et al. [85] (b)

Hospitalised adult patients from medical and surgical wards in a general and teaching hospital

608

≥18

Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer, Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL, USA

(calibrated)

3

Non-dominant

Sitting position

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Between 0 and 30° dorsiflexion

2nd

–

–

1 min

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Berlin, Germany

Spira et al. [86]

Community-dwelling older adults from the BASE-II study

1405

60–80

Smedley hand dynamometer, Scandidact, Denmark

6

Both

Standing upright

Adducted and neutrally rotated

90°

Forearm neutral

Neutral

–

–

–

–

Higher value

Fried’s criteria*

Cross-sectional study

Manchester, UK and Leuven, Belgium

Verschuere et al. [87] (d)

Men from the European Male Ageing Study

679

40–79

Jamar hand dynamometer, TEC Inc., Clifton, NJ

6

Both

Sitting position

–

Forearms resting on the arms of the chair

Neutral, over the end of the arm of the chair, thumb facing upwards

Adjusted so that the thumb is round one side of the handle and the four fingers are around the other side

Yes

–

–

Higher value

Fried’s criteria*

Multicentre cohort study

Italy

Vetrano et al. [88]

Older adults admitted to acute care wards, of seven Italian hospitals, from the CRIME study

770

≥65

North Coast hydraulic hand dynamometer, North Coast Medical Inc., Morgan Hill, CA

4

Both

Sitting position or lying at 30° in bed (when unable to sit)

–

90° or with elbows supported

Neutral

–

–

–

–

Higher value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cohort study

Ankara, Turkey

Yalcin et al. [89]

Residents in Seyranbagları Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center

141

≥65

Takei Scientific Instruments, Niigata, Japan

2

Dominant

–

Abducted (30°)

180°

Palm perpendicular to the shoulder line

–

–

5 s

–

Mean value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

Cross-sectional study

Obu, Aichi, Japan

Yoshida et al. [90]

Community-dwelling older adults from Obu Study of Health Promotion for the Elderly

4811

≥65

Grip-D hand dynamometer, Takei, Niigata, Japan

1

Dominant

Standing upright

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Single value

M: <28.8 kgf

W: <18.2 kgf

Cohort study

North west regions and Western suburbs of Adelaide, Australia

Yu et al. [91]

Community-dwelling individuals, from the CASA, FAMAS and NWAHS studies

1123

≥18

Lafayette Instrument Company, IN, USA (CASA and NWAHS), Smedley, Chicago, IL (FAMAS)

3

Dominant

Sitting position

–

Arm supported by a horizontal surface

–

–

–

–

–

Mean value

M: <30 kgf

W: <20 kgf

  1. S Seconds; Min Minutes; M Men; W Women
  2. (a) Study cited the ASHT 1981 protocol
  3. (b) Study cited the ASHT 1992 protocol
  4. (c) Study cited the ASHT protocol, without specifying which protocol year was used
  5. (d) Study cited the Southampton protocol
  6. * Fried’s criteria (Cut-off points for handgrip strength) Men: ≤29 kgf (BMI ≤ 24 kg/m2); ≤30 kgf (BMI 24.1–26 kg/m2); ≤30 kgf (BMI 26.1–28 kg/m2); ≤32 kgf (BMI > 28 kg/m2) / Women: ≤17 kgf (BMI ≤ 23 kg/m2); ≤17.3 kgf (BMI 23.1–26 kg/m2); ≤18 kgf (BMI 26.1–29 kg/m2); ≤21 kgf (BMI > 29 kg/m2)
  7. ** Not defined due to the type of analysis conducted by the study