Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between frailty and outcome variables mortality and hospitalisation, within each level of the resources

From: Can resources moderate the impact of levels of frailty on adverse outcomes among (pre-) frail older people? A longitudinal study

 

Mortality

Hospitalisation

OR of frailty (95% CI)a

OR of frailty (95% CI)a

Frailty (frail vs. pre-frail)

2.99 (2.17–4.13)

2.21 (1.73–2.82)

Resources

 Level of education

  

  low

2.80 (1.85–4.25)

1.98 (1.49–2.65)

  high

3.48 (1.98–6.10)

3.04 (1.80–5.13)

  interaction (p value)

0.616

0.148

 Income

  

  low

3.48 (2.20–5.51)

2.55 (1.81–3.58)

  high

2.62 (1.64–4.21)

1.70 (1.18–2.44)

  interaction (p value)

0.394

0.138

 Informal care

  

  not available

1.17 (0.29–4.74)

3.18 (1.42–7.12)

  available

3.12 (2.23–4.37)

2.15 (1.66–2.78)

  interaction (p value)

0.278

0.299

 Living situation

  

  living alone

3.08 (1.85–5.14)

2.60 (1.75–3.88)

  not living alone

2.86 (1.84–4.44)

2.06 (1.49–2.85)

  interaction (p value)

0.958

0.290

 Mastery

  

  low

3.04 (1.96–4.73)

2.15 (1.56–2.96)

  high

3.33 (1.79–6.18)

1.81 (1.10–2.97)

  interaction (p value)

0.689

0.723

 Self-management

  

  low

2.24 (1.47–3.42)

2.41 (1.72–3.39)

  high

3.75 (2.14–6.58)

1.84 (1.22–2.78)

  interaction (p value)

0.151

0.329

  1. All models are adjusted for age and gender
  2. The first level of each resource is considered disadvantageous, the second beneficial
  3. aOR (95% confidence interval)