Skip to main content

Table 2 Missingness, means (SD) and content validity index scores for C-HiP Index items

From: Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey

Item

Missingness

Meana

SD

Content validity index

No.

%

Clarity

Relevance

Affective commitment subscale

AFF01

I believe in the value of hip protectors.

2

0.4

4.18

0.88

0.91

1.00

AFF02

Hip protectors are necessary.

6

1.1

4.11

0.93

1.00

0.91

AFF03

Hip protectors are needed.

10

1.9

4.16

0.92

0.91

1.00

AFF04

Hip protectors serve an important purpose.

2

0.4

4.20

0.89

1.00

1.00

Cognitive commitment subscale

COG01

I believe in the effectiveness of hip protectors.

3

0.6

4.16

0.91

0.91

1.00

COG02

I am convinced that, when worn, hip protectors help to protect my residents from injury.

1

0.2

4.17

0.92

1.00

1.00

COG03

I think that hip protectors work.

2

0.4

4.12

0.91

1.00

1.00

COG04

I think that hip protectors are useful.

3

0.6

4.16

0.87

0.91

1.00

COG05

I am convinced that, when worn, hip protectors reduce risk for injury from falls.

0

0

4.17

0.98

1.00

1.00

COG06

I doubt the effectiveness of hip protectors.

7

1.3

2.29

1.19

0.36

0.36

Behavioural commitment subscale

BEH01

I am always willing to work with hip protectors.

5

0.9

4.28

0.77

0.91

1.00

BEH02

I try to remain positive about hip protectors, even under challenging circumstances.

1

0.2

4.21

0.74

0.91

0.91

BEH03

When it comes to hip protectors, I am willing to accept changes in the roles and responsibilities of my job.

14

2.6

4.11

0.82

0.55

0.73

BEH04

I am willing to put in a great deal of effort, above and beyond what is normally expected, to work with hip protectors.

5

0.9

3.98

0.84

0.73

0.82

BEH05

I am willing to adjust the way I do my job, as required to use hip protectors.

4

0.8

4.13

0.80

0.91

0.91

  1. aExpectation-Maximization (EM) imputed means; responses ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)