Skip to main content

Table 3 Household characteristics by catastrophic health expenditure, adults 50+ years with diabetes, China and India, SAGE Wave 1, 2007–2010

From: Diabetes mellitus medication use and catastrophic healthcare expenditure among adults aged 50+ years in China and India: results from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE)

 

China (n = 630)

India (n = 439)

Non-catastrophic

Catastrophic

Non-catastrophic

Catastrophic

N (a %)

N (a %)

N (a %)

N (a %)

Overall

524 (83.2)

106 (16.8)

410 (93.4)

29 (6.6)

Diabetes medication

 No

68 (14.1)

11 (12.8)

120 (26.8)

9 (24.8)

 Yes

456 (85.9)

95 (87.2)

290 (73.2)

20 (75.2)

Lifestyle modification

 No

133 (24.5)

26 (29.7)

179 (39.4)

14 (41.3)

 Yes

391 (75.5)

80 (70.3)

231 (60.6)

15 (58.7)

Residence

 Urban

398 (70.9)***

63 (50.7)

199 (47.6)

16 (32.6)

 Rural

126 (29.1)

43 (49.3)

211 (52.4)

13 (67.4)

Household wealth

 1 (Richest)

131 (26.8)***

12 (8.8)

179 (46.1)

12 (29.5)

 2

147 (27.9)

20 (25.4)

114 (24.7)

6 (31.3)

 3

118 (22.9)

27 (27.9)

58 (11.5)

5 (11.5)

 4 (Poorest 2 quintiles)

128 (22.4)

47 (37.9)

59 (17.8)

6 (27.7)

Household financial status

 Very good/Good

102 (18.9)

13 (12.9)

128 (33.0)

15 (52.4)

 Moderate

331 (63.0)

66 (63.1)

202 (44.9)

8 (27.8)

 Very bad/Bad

91 (18.1)

27 (24.1)

80 (22.2)

6 (19.9)

Educational attainment (household head)

 University or higher

45 (8.7)***

5 (3.3)

81 (21.5)

7 (10.6)

 Secondary/High school

246 (44.1)

37 (29.6)

155 (41.4)

7 (35.5)

 Primary school or less

233 (47.2)

64 (67.2)

174 (37.1)

15 (53.9)

  1. Pearson χ 2 tests undertaken for country comparisons. *p-value < 0.10; **p-value < 0.05; ***p-value < 0.01
  2. asurvey sampling weights used to give percentage estimates. Percentages may not sum due to rounding