Skip to content
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Magnitude of potentially inappropriate prescribing in Germany among older patients with generalized anxiety disorder

  • Ariel Berger1,
  • Marko Mychaskiw2,
  • Ellen Dukes3,
  • John Edelsberg1 and
  • Gerry Oster1Email author
BMC Geriatrics20099:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-9-31

Received: 06 February 2009

Accepted: 27 July 2009

Published: 27 July 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Feb 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Howard
8 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masahiro Akishita
22 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ariel Berger
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Howard
20 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ariel Berger
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2318-9-31

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Policy Analysis, Inc, Brookline, USA
(2)
Worldwide Medical and Outcomes Research, Pfizer, Inc, New York City, USA
(3)
Global Outcomes Research, Pfizer, Inc, New York City, USA

Advertisement