Skip to main content

Table 5 Studies identified with measures of brain structure or function and muscle structure or function but no associations given in paper or on request

From: A systematic review of the evidence that brain structure is related to muscle structure and their relationship to brain and muscle function in humans over the lifecourse

Authors

Year

Country and dataset

n

Study design

Mean age (sd)

Male (%)

Brain structure or function

Muscle structure or function

Studies with brain structure and muscle structure (re: Table 2 )

1. Chowdhury et al. [79]

1994

Sweden

8

Methodology paper

35 (8)

100

Brain volume (CT)

Calculated skeletal muscle volume (CT)

Studies with brain structure and muscle function (re: Table 3 )

2. Liu-Ambrose et al. [80]

2010

Canada, Exercise RCT in Vancouver

155

RCT, prospective over 52 weeks

69.6 (2.9)

0

Whole brain volume (MRI)

Gait speed, quads strength and muscle power

3. Nadkarni et al. [81]

2012

Canada, Sunnybrook Dementia Study

20 controls

Cross-sectional substudy of longitudinal study

75 (9)

40

Score on Age-Related White Matter Change Scale (MRI)

Self-selected speed on a treadmill

4. Sullivan et al. [82]

2005

USA, California, Stanford

51

Case–control study

45.2 (13.9)

100

Caudate, putamen, nucleus accumbens and medial septal / diagonal band volumes and ICV (MRI)

Bilateral grip strength

Studies with brain function and muscle structure (re: Table 4 )

5. Guthrie et al. [83]

2004

Australia, The Melbourne Women's Midlife Health Project

1897

9 year prospective, observational population based sample

Median 50

0

Episodic verbal memory using a 10 word recall task (CERAD)

Body composition (DEXA)

6. Ellis et al. [84]

2009

Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging

768 healthy controls

Longitudinal case control study (AD vs MCI vs normal)

70.0 (7.0)

43

CVLT-II, Logical memory, RCFT, digit span, digit symbol coding, D-KEFS verbal fluency, BNT, clock, WTAR, Stroop.

Body composition (DEXA) in subgroup in Perth

7. Dao et al. [85]

2013

Canada, Exercise RCT in Vancouver

114

Secondary analysis of RCT data

69.4 (2.9)

0

Stroop test, MMSE

Sub-total lean mass (DEXA)

8. Schwartz et al. [86]

2013

Canada, Saguenay Youth Study

983

Longitudinal cohort study

M 14.9 (1.8), F 15.1 (1.9)

48.8

Executive function and Memory

FFM (BIA)

9. Bagger et al. [87]

2004

Denmark, PERF study

5607

Prospective, observational cohort study

71.1 (6.6)

0

Short Blessed Test

TLM (DEXA)

10. Abellan van Kan [88]

2013

France, EPIDOS study

3025

Prospective multi-centre cohort study

80.51(3.9)

0

SPMSQ

Lean mass and ALM (DEXA)

11. Nourhashemi et al. [89]

2002

France, EPIDOS study

7105

Cross-sectional study

80.3 (3.65) (SPMSQ > =8)

0

SPSMQ for orientation, concentration and memory

FFM (DEXA)

12. Nourhashemi et al. [90]

2001

France, EPIDOS study

7364

Prospective multicentre study

Broken down by ADLs; means 79.9-82.7 years

0

Pfeiffer’s test (aka SPMSQ)

Body composition (DEXA)

13. Paolisso et al. [91]

1997

Italy, Naples

30 (>50y), 30 (75-99y) 19 (>99y)

Observational study

44.5(1.8), 78(0.7), 102(0.8)

46.8

MMSE

FFM (BIA)

14. Malaguarnera et al. [92]

2007

Italy, Sicily

66

Placebo controlled, randomized, double-blind, 2-phase study

101(1.3) treatment, 101(1.4) placebo

31.8

MMSE

Total muscle mass (BIA)

15. Jacobsen et al. [93]

2012

Netherlands

318

RCT

Mean for each arm given range 73.4-74.0

0

15 words test and Trails B test

BIA and DEXA

16. Genton et al. [94]

2011

Switzerland

213 in 1999 and 112 in 2008

Cross-sectional study with 9 year f/u visit

1999 M 71.7(5.2)

1999 49.3

MMSE

FFM (BIA), ASMM (DEXA) and BCM (total body potassium)

2008 M 80.3(5.2)

2008 49.1

1999 F 73.2(5.5)

 

2008 F 82.2(5.6)

17. Donaldson et al. [95]

1996

USA, Baltimore

73

Cross-sectional study

68.8 (7.2)

31.5

MMSE

FFM (DEXA)

18. Bove et al. [96]

2013

USA, Boston, Harvard

12

Cross-sectional study

31.6 (6.4)

0

Multiple tests broken down to 5 cognitive domains

Cross sectional area of mid-thigh (CT)

19. Papadakis et al. [97]

1995

USA, California, San Francisco

104

Cross-sectional study

75.5(4.9)

100

MMSE, Trails B and DSST

Lean tissue mass (DEXA)

20. Janssen [98]

2006

USA, Cardiovascular health study

Baseline 5036

Longitudinal observational study (over 8 years)

65-70 (42.7%), 71–76 (32.7%), 83–89 (18.2%), ≥90 (6.4%)

43.6

MMSE

Whole body muscle mass (BIA) and normalized for height to the skeletal muscle index (SMI, kg/m2)

21. Masley et al. [99]

2008

USA, Florida

56

RCT

Controls 43.5 (11.2), Intervention 47.1 (9.4)

Control 39.3, Intervention 53.6

CNS vital signs battery

FFM (BIA)

22. Houston et al. [100]

2012

USA, Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

2641

Longitudinal cohort study

74.7 (2.9)

48.9

MMSE

Lean mass (DEXA)

23. Middleton et al. [101]

2011

USA, Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

197

Cross-sectional study from a 9 year longitudinal cohort study

Separated into tertile of activity, means range from 73.9-75.8

Not given

3MS

FFM (DEXA)

24. Koster et al. [102]

2010

USA, Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

2949

Cross-sectional study from a 9 year longitudinal cohort study

Age 70–79 at baseline

48.5

3MS

Total bone-free lean mass, trunk lean mass, appendicular lean mass (DEXA)

25. de Rekeneire et al. [103]

2003

USA, Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

2926

Baseline data from a 9 year longitudinal cohort study

Diabetes mellitis (DM) 73.6 (2.9) and non-DM 73.6 (2.9)

DM 55.9 Non-DM 46.9

MMSE and DSST

Lean mass and lean soft tissue mass (i.e. lean mass minus bone) (DEXA)

26. de Rekeneire et al. [104]

2003

USA, Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

Fallers 652, non-fallers 2398

Baseline data from a 9 year longitudinal cohort study

Range 70-79

Fallers 41.7, non-fallers 50.3

Teng Mini-mental State Examination and DSST

Total muscle mass and skeletal muscle mass in the legs (DEXA)

27. Watts et al. [105]

2013

USA, Kansas, Brain Aging Project

74 healthy controls

Longitudinal case–control study (Alzheimer’s dementia vs. controls)

74.0 (7.2)

43

MMSE

Lean mass (DEXA)

28. Canon et al. [106]

2011

USA, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

867

Cross-sectional longitudinal study

Range 60-85

44.8

Digit-symbol coding test

Lean tissue mass (DEXA)

29. Garry et al. [107]

2007

USA, New Mexico Aging Process Study

809 rolling participants (average 302 seen per year)

Longitudinal Aging study (1979–2003)

60+ Varied between years

40

3MS (annual), WAIS R digit span, Fuld object memory evaluation, Color Trails 1 and 2, clock drawing (all less than annual)

Annual skeletal tissue mass (DEXA)

30. Haren et al. [108]

2008

USA, St Louis, African-American Health Study

124

Population based longitudinal study

56.1(4.4)

100

MMSE, TMT A&B

TLM and ASM (DEXA)

31. Dvorak et al. [109]

1998

USA, Vermont

30

Case–control study

73(7)

43.3

MMSE

ASM and FFM (DEXA)