Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mudge |
| 23 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Drawz |
| 18 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Mudge |
| 2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Drawz |
| 11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Neil Boudville |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Jul 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-43 |
You can find further information about peer review here.